To gain the local, on-the-ground understanding of the I-80 study area and the issues important to key stakeholders, the study team held one-on-one meetings to kick off the project with the following organizations:
- The Villages of Minooka, Channahon, Shorewood, Rockdale, and New Lenox
- The City of Joliet
- IDOT District 3
- Kendall, Grundy and Will Counties.
At these meetings, the study team provided an overview of the project, requested specific data or information that the organizations may have that is pertinent to the project, solicited suggestions for participants on the Project Working Group, and encouraged discussion of specific issues and concerns. A significant amount of valuable information was obtained that has assisted the study team with project development. Additional one-on-one meetings may be held as the study proceeds.
Context Sensitive Solutions (CSS)
IDOT is used a process called Context Sensitive Solutions, or CSS, to involve study area stakeholders in the development of the I-80 project. According to IDOT’s CSS policy, a stakeholder is anyone who could be affected by the project and has a stake in its outcome. Stakeholders include residents and other interested parties who can help IDOT understand the needs for, and concerns about, the proposed project. IDOT’s goals for the CSS process include:
- Understand key concerns of study area stakeholders
- Involve stakeholders early and often in the decision-making process
- Address different types of transportation modes (bus, walking, transit)
- Be flexible about the design whenever possible to address stakeholders’ concerns; and
- Develop a facility that fits into its surroundings by preserving scenic, aesthetic, historic and environmental resources while maintaining safety and mobility.
IDOT's Phase I study and CSS processes included gathering input from the project stakeholders and the public before making a decision about a project. The I-80 project included a Stakeholder Involvement Plan that set goals for public and stakeholder involvement and identified ways to help reach those goals.
The CSS process was led by a Project Study Group – also called the project team – which guided the alternatives development process, coordinated feedback from the project stakeholders and the general public, and made the final decisions about the project. A Project Working Group is a group of stakeholders who provide input at key project milestones, including the purpose and need, alternatives, alternatives carried forward and – ultimately – the preferred alternative.
Public Input to Date
IDOT also reached out to potentially affected community members using newsletters, press releases, a project website and large-scale public meetings. These tools provided the public the information needed to make informed decisions and offer important input about the project alternatives. They also provided a way for the project team and the general public to discuss the trade-offs between the improvements and their impacts.
The outreach efforts for the I-80 project have included seven Project Working Group meetings and three public meetings, two community meetings, and a public hearing held on two days at different locations. The Project Study Group considered all input provided by the project’s stakeholders while developing, refining and recommending the alternatives to be carried forward.
The preferred alternative has been selected for the improvement of the I-80 corridor and was presented at Public Hearings held in November 2019.
What groups had input into the alternatives development and selection process?
Three primary groups had input into the alternatives development process:
- Project Study Group – IDOT, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and the project consultant team.
- Project Working Group – City, county and other community leaders and officials; public and private interest groups; area residents; land use/planning professionals; and transportation agencies.
- General Public – Any person with an interest in the project.