I80 web graphics JUL30

Opportunities to Get Involved

Project Working Group (PWG)

The PWG consisted of the chief elected officials or their designees who have the authority to speak on behalf of the six municipalities (Minooka, Channahon, Shorewood, Rockdale, Joliet, and New Lenox) and the three counties (Kendall, Grundy, and Will) within the study corridor. The PWG was also comprised of transportation and engineering officials, economic development organizations or councils, land use planning agencies, local municipal and county staff, and environmental groups. The PWG also provides opportunities for study participation by the region’s culturally and economically diverse population. The membership included:

  • Neighborhood organizations
  • City Council/Village Board and County Board members whose districts serve the study area
  • Local community organizations
  • Special interest groups

The purpose of the PWG was to provide input on the development of the Purpose and Need statement, the alternatives to be carried forward for evaluation, and the Preferred Alternative.

Responsibilities include:

  • Providing input to the study process
  • Reaching consensus at key project milestones such as the project Purpose and Need, the range of alternatives to be advanced for further study, and the recommended alternative.
  • Focus on technical aspects of the project development process.
  • Provide external subject-specific information and input with respect to the identified categories.
  • The PWG will interfaced directly with the PSG. The meetings were designed to encourage timely and meaningful opportunities for participation.

Stakeholder Outreach Meetings

Stakeholder involvement for the I-80 study was an ongoing process from project initiation through completion. Various meetings were held throughout the project development process to provide outreach opportunities to all stakeholders.

  • Small Group Meetings Small group meetings engaged stakeholders to share information and foster discussions to address specific project issues, allowed for more specialized discussions and input, and aided the general public in better understanding the project goals and objectives.
  • Agency & Municipal Meetings Agency and Municipal meetings were held to discuss and coordinate specific project issues with those that would be impacted by the project.
  • Public Meetings/Public Hearings Public Meetings were held at key points during the project development phase to engage the public. The purpose of the meetings was to solicit the preferences and opinions of those who participate regarding the information presented. Questions raised by meeting participants, depending on the nature, were either answered immediately or addressed in subsequent meetings, newsletters or other communication mechanisms.

A Public Hearing was held near the end of the Phase 1 Study. The Public Hearing presented the evaluation of the recommended alternative, click here to view materials for the Hearing. The hearing is part of a Federal requirement for the Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The public had the opportunity to view and provide their testimony on the preferred alternative. Comments received at the public meetings were documented and the information was considered as a part of the analysis and evaluation of the improvement alternatives. Individuals on the mailing list received invitations in the mail announcing meeting information.

Overview